Activity Description :

 

We all know there are some technologies that change the world, and some people who claim they have technology that will change the world...but don't! How to tell the good bet from the frauds.

 

ACTIVITY TYPE(S) : Worksheet, Discussion

DURATION :

Short version : 20–25 minutes
Full discussion : 45 minutes
Research+Simulation : 1-2 class periods
Case study : 1 class period

SUBJECT AREAS : AP Biology and Biotechnology Pathways 

KEY CONCEPTS :

Evaluating scientific claims and company products and profiles

LEARNING OBJECTIVES :

1. Distinguish credible biotech companies from hype‑driven or fraudulent ones.

2. Explain why scientific transparency and peer review matter in biotechnology.

3. Analyze how hype influences public trust and investor behavior.

4. Compare Theranos and Moderna using evidence, claims, and regulatory oversight.

5. Evaluate whether investors should be required to understand the science behind biotech ventures.

6. Identify the role of scientific literacy in responsible funding decisions.

BACKGROUND KNOWLEDGE NEEDED : Basic familiarity with what recombinant DNA / genetic modification is is helpful but not required — the Do Now and Display Visuals introduce the historical case from scratch.

 

STANDARDS ALIGNMENT : 

NGSS HS‑ETS1‑1: Analyze a major global challenge
NGSS HS‑ETS1‑3: Evaluate solutions
NGSS SEP: Analyzing data, argument from evidence
NGSS CCC: Stability & change; cause & effect